Archives
Archives
| From: | Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally) | ||
| Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:34:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 8103dc67284bd3fb0f6a792298bec78bce8c64ca.camel@infinera.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally) by "Miroslav Šulc" |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09:45 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > in case the package does not work with java > 1.8 (still, i suggest we |
| 4 | > first try to resolve the issue before we use this restriction as it |
| 5 | > might cause some issues in the future) |
| 6 | > virtual/jdk:1.8 |
| 7 | > virtual/jre:1.8 |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | This does not seem to be enforced by java eclasses. Example dev-java/icedtea-web has |
| 11 | BDEPEND=virtual/jdk:1.8 but building icedtea-web with openjdk:11 as system default will |
| 12 | try to build with java-11 and the build will fail. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Jocke |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally) | "Miroslav Šulc" <fordfrog@g.o> |