1 |
On Saturday 19 November 2005 01:13, Michael Cummings wrote: |
2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > "Resolved - Fixed"? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Hmmm, might have been aq epiphany quirk (wouldn't be the first) - when i |
6 |
> looked there was no comment indicated. |
7 |
|
8 |
Nope. I wrote ".". Bugs wrote the above for me. ;) |
9 |
|
10 |
> > The last discussion that was had ended up with a TDEPEND, but that |
11 |
> > doesn't cover the additional SRC_URI requirements. Besides SRC_URI, are |
12 |
> > there any other requirements that might sneak in later on? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> and this is the other reason i took it off -dev - so i don't sound like |
15 |
> an idiot -there's a TPDEPEND now?? That would 100% cover my needs, since |
16 |
> these are testing depends. |
17 |
|
18 |
A TDEPEND? Nope, not yet. It's just a possible solution that won't require |
19 |
overloading USE flags for internal purposes further. |
20 |
|
21 |
> > Nah, let's get it in the open (again) and get it dealt with. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> OK, so i violated that, but now i'm wondering if my needs are already |
24 |
> covered (hey, could happen) :) |
25 |
|
26 |
Not just yet... |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Jason Stubbs |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |