| 1 |
On Saturday 19 November 2005 01:13, Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > "Resolved - Fixed"? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Hmmm, might have been aq epiphany quirk (wouldn't be the first) - when i |
| 6 |
> looked there was no comment indicated. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Nope. I wrote ".". Bugs wrote the above for me. ;) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> > The last discussion that was had ended up with a TDEPEND, but that |
| 11 |
> > doesn't cover the additional SRC_URI requirements. Besides SRC_URI, are |
| 12 |
> > there any other requirements that might sneak in later on? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> and this is the other reason i took it off -dev - so i don't sound like |
| 15 |
> an idiot -there's a TPDEPEND now?? That would 100% cover my needs, since |
| 16 |
> these are testing depends. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
A TDEPEND? Nope, not yet. It's just a possible solution that won't require |
| 19 |
overloading USE flags for internal purposes further. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> > Nah, let's get it in the open (again) and get it dealt with. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> OK, so i violated that, but now i'm wondering if my needs are already |
| 24 |
> covered (hey, could happen) :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Not just yet... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives