| 1 |
On 11/11/2011 2:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi guys, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> 1x rebuild for cups useflag |
| 7 |
> 1x update |
| 8 |
> 1x rebuild for cups useflag |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If you screw the ebuild up then always think if the change is worth |
| 11 |
> the stupid long recompile time. |
| 12 |
> Like it is not enough there is version bump every few days... |
| 13 |
> Just alter only live ebuild and branch of it with each release and do |
| 14 |
> not alter the releases unless really critical bug is there. People are |
| 15 |
> patient and they can wait for bugfixes. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Imagine that I would adopt your approach with libreoffice. I suppose |
| 18 |
> people would chain me to some wall and use as target practice as |
| 19 |
> result fo my actions :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Cheers |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Tom |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I often rebuild chromium several times a day, so I probably don't notice |
| 26 |
the effect that small changes would have on a more typical user. I'm |
| 27 |
sorry that the frequent updates are inconvenient for you. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I think Pawel and I do a good job of not screwing with the stable channel. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
We try to limit most of the changes to the dev channel releases (hard |
| 32 |
masked). The cups use flag change happened just before upstream pushed |
| 33 |
16.x to the beta channel (~arch), so that put us in an odd spot when |
| 34 |
adding the cups use flag back. |
Archives