| 1 |
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:15:22AM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 01 January 2006 06:30, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Keep in mind that every resubmission to the council for review must |
| 4 |
> > first be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list 7 days (minimum) before |
| 5 |
> > being submitted as an agenda item which itself occurs 7 days before the |
| 6 |
> > meeting. Simply put, the gentoo-dev mailing list must be notified at |
| 7 |
> > least 14 days before the meeting itself. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think I'm too late for this month, but want to put it on the table before I |
| 10 |
> forget about it. I'd appreciate a three months moratorium, disallowing |
| 11 |
> everyone to add new packages to the tree (despite new dependencies of |
| 12 |
> existing packages), so everyone is forced/asked to put his energy in existing |
| 13 |
> ebuilds, especially unmaintained ones. Sort of spring-cleaning, because parts |
| 14 |
> of the tree look like a dump. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-1 |
| 17 |
Asking people to focus on cleaning the tree? Sure. Generate a list |
| 18 |
of candidates would help. Blocking new packages? No... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
~harring |
Archives