| 1 |
Thanks for this answer, but isn't it strange that portage calls this a |
| 2 |
downgrade? Perhaps the "D" should be Slot-specific? |
| 3 |
After all this seems to be an upgrade of the gnome1.4-slot, right? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Ben |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 11:24, Spider wrote: |
| 8 |
> begin quote |
| 9 |
> On 26 Feb 2003 10:15:10 +0100 |
| 10 |
> Benjamin Podszun <ben@××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > Hi there. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > emerge -up --deep world gives me |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > [ebuild UD] gnome-base/gnome-panel-1.4.2-r2 [2.2.0.1-r1] |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > I don't think that it's really a good idea to downgrade that far, |
| 19 |
> > right?;) Any hints what could cause the problem? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> SLOT ;) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> gnome-panel 1.4 and 2.x are mutually nonintrusive (this -r2 is a fix for |
| 24 |
> 1.4 so it won't overwrite 2.x's screenshooter util) and they will both |
| 25 |
> stay happily in your system |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> the reason you might have gnome-panel 1.4 installed might be that you |
| 28 |
> have some gnome program that wants to install a panel applet, but is |
| 29 |
> still at the gtk-1.2 era (gnome 1.4 ). This makes the panel applet |
| 30 |
> incompatible with the new gnome-panel, so it pulls in the old gtk 1.2 |
| 31 |
> panel, and builds nicely against it. (in fact you can actually run the |
| 32 |
> gnome 1.4 panel on a gnome2 desktop : "panel &" ;) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> //Spider |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> -- |
| 40 |
> begin .signature |
| 41 |
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 42 |
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 43 |
> end |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives