| 1 |
On Friday 19 March 2010 17:06:19 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/19/2010 07:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday 19 March 2010 10:07:59 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 03/19/2010 04:04 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> On 19-03-2010 15:59:07 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>>> Any objections to turning on the udev use flag by default in the base |
| 7 |
> >>>> profile? |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>> Yeah, can we just do it in the Linux profiles only somewhere? |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> If udev doesn't work on the system, the flag should be masked like it's |
| 12 |
> >> already on BSD. Is there some place where udev works, but shouldn't be |
| 13 |
> >> on by default? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > wouldnt it make more sense to invert the logic ? udev only works on |
| 16 |
> > linux, so mask it everywhere by default and unmask it for linux |
| 17 |
> > profiles. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> What matters is the amount of entries. Do we have more linux than other |
| 20 |
> profiles? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
no, we dont. stacked profiles means theres 1 linux base. |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives