Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 09:26:11
Message-Id: jn0iou$8m6$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 by Ulrich Mueller
1 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2
3 > | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
4 > |
5 > | See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
6 > | configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and
7 > | alternatives should be investigated. If it isn't, a lot of
8 > | documentation will have to be updated. (And an alternative should
9 > | likely still be provided.)"
10 > |
11 > | [4]
12 > | [<http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-
13 project/msg_c96d1b724cd736702820fa5ff1547557.xml>
14 >
15 From the first reply:
16
17 "To clarify, the question is whether or not we support a separate /usr
18 _without_ mounting it early via an initramfs."
19
20 I hope that settles that particular issue.
21
22 --
23 #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)

Replies