1 |
> On 8 Feb 2021, at 00:52, Aisha Tammy <gentoo.dev@×××××.cc> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Hi all, |
4 |
> [snip] |
5 |
> This transition is expected to take a long time so there shouldn't be a worry about sudden |
6 |
> changes in packages. We are going to keep some of the more important old GTK:2 ebuilds, |
7 |
> such as the CJK ebuilds, around as long as we have GTK:2 in the tree. Newer packages are |
8 |
> encouraged to be GTK:3 only. |
9 |
> The starting point of the transition are packages which have GTK:3 support and optional GTK:2 |
10 |
> support. Most of the bugs of this kind have already been filed[1] and is the safest |
11 |
> place to start killing off GTK:2. |
12 |
|
13 |
This is completely fair, but I’d just like to add that dropping GTK 2 should ideally be done in revbumps |
14 |
and given time before stabilisation & cleanup to ease the pain for users. |
15 |
|
16 |
Yes, it’s been a long time coming, and this is only the first step, but some people have a sentimental |
17 |
attachment to it, so we should give them time to get used to the new interfaces rather than yanking |
18 |
it entirely from all versions in the tree where it’s possible. |
19 |
|
20 |
TL;DR: Great, let’s just not rush to cleanup old so people can revert if issues arise with new designs |
21 |
or whatever in the GUI. |
22 |
|
23 |
> |
24 |
> Best, |
25 |
> Aisha |
26 |
> |
27 |
> [1] https://blog.gtk.org/2020/12/16/gtk-4-0/ |
28 |
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/768993 |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |