| 1 |
Mike Frysinger ha scritto: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Wednesday 02 March 2005 01:37 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:17 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>>because previous version had that functionality and users are using it. |
| 10 |
>>>- Put a new version *without* that functionality make users unhappy |
| 11 |
>>>- Don't let disponible a new version because of functionalityes that |
| 12 |
>>>they are not using make that users unappy |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>Simple: if you need that particular functionality you must use a version |
| 16 |
>>which include it (meaning: do not use ~ARCH if you are not prepared to |
| 17 |
>>take the consequences). |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>yep ... and this is why we have all the files in /etc/portage/ so you can lock |
| 22 |
>in older versions for a while |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
In this case iptables-1.3 is missing, it's not a old version, it's the |
| 26 |
new one :p since I'm using a plain iptables I've modified the old one |
| 27 |
and used that to install the 1.3 version. |
| 28 |
see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
>if these features are really that critical, why dont you forward port them |
| 31 |
>yourself ? :p |
| 32 |
>-mike |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
Because I miss know-how on that window. :-( |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives