1 |
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:42 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: |
2 |
> > > "Developers should file stabilization requests, however, pending |
3 |
> > > stabilization on these arches alone cannot block any further steps (as, |
4 |
> > > e.g., cleanup of old versions)." |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Isn't that implied by exp status, i.e. separate from this? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Hmm... do all "degraded" profiles have to be "exp"? |
9 |
> (Need to get the coffee first.) |
10 |
|
11 |
To be honest, I don't think they are really required to be bound |
12 |
together. |
13 |
|
14 |
Degraded just means 'ARCH is ~ARCH'. stable/dev/exp determines whether |
15 |
~ARCH-level integrity we care about. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Best regards, |
19 |
Michał Górny |