Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kumba <kumba@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:51:36
Message-Id: 3F1583F6.3020204@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable by Seemant Kulleen
1 Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2
3 > Hi All,
4 >
5 > We'd like to receive comments (the negative ones, especially) for moving
6 > gcc-3.2.3-r1, glibc-2.3.2-r1 and binutils-2.14.90.0.2 from ~arch to arch (at least for x86 platform).
7 >
8 > Thanks,
9 >
10
11 All work fine for me. I just recently sent an ebuild patch to azarah to
12 allow glibc-2.3.2-r1 to build on sparc64, so we might need a little
13 longer on testing it (Although it works fine on my Blade 100). I've
14 been pondering marking this stable on mips for some time. My x86 box
15 ran this for a time, until I moved to glibc-2.3.2-r2 and gcc-3.3.
16
17 --Kumba
18
19 --
20 "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world:
21 small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are
22 elsewhere." --Elrond
23
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list