| 1 |
Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit |
| 3 |
> of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm |
| 4 |
> not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format |
| 5 |
> exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out looking |
| 6 |
> for some opinions or ideas for my new GLEP. One of the obvious things |
| 7 |
> I'll cover is all the ambiguity of the GLEP with regard to the data |
| 8 |
> inside each of the files. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
One idea worth considering is making users just ebuilds with a |
| 14 |
supporting eclass. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Petteri |
Archives