| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
> On 13:57 Thu 10 Jul , Markus Dittrich wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The sci herd would like to propose the addition of a new |
| 4 |
> > octave-forge.eclass as well as a new portage category dev-octave to |
| 5 |
> > house new octave-forge ebuilds. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If the ebuilds are truly simple templates (as they appeared from a quick |
| 8 |
> glance), perhaps a script more like g-cpan or g-pypi would be merited |
| 9 |
> instead of large numbers of trivial ebuilds? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Hi Donnie, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thank you very much for your comments. The octave-forge.eclass |
| 15 |
turned out to be much more effective than I initially anticipated |
| 16 |
and the individual octave-forge ebuilds are now indeed mostly |
| 17 |
simple templates. I will have to have a closer look at g-cpan to see |
| 18 |
if we'd be able to fit the octave-forge ebuilds into such a framework. |
| 19 |
If so, this may be the way to go and would avoid cluttering |
| 20 |
the portage tree unnecessarily. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Best, |
| 23 |
Markus |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Markus Dittrich (markusle) |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 30 |
Scientific applications |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives