| 1 |
On Monday 13 April 2009 17:17:36 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
| 2 |
> So we are now a year later, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> some people are getting excited at getting rid of .la files again but no |
| 5 |
> decent solution has been presented yet that I am aware of. We've had two |
| 6 |
> situations recently: |
| 7 |
> * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264249 which got |
| 8 |
> reverted |
| 9 |
> * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266016 which author of |
| 10 |
> the change don't want to revert |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> My questions are simple: |
| 13 |
> * do we have a plan ? I mean something real, not people doing |
| 14 |
> stuff in their "territory" or "lonewolves". |
| 15 |
> * do we want to *harm* our users base by changing this starting |
| 16 |
> from low level libs ? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
it either moves ahead sanely, or it doesnt move ahead at all. Bug 266016 is |
| 19 |
an example of doing it wrong for no real benefit whatsoever. |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives