1 |
On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
2 |
> Doug Goldstein wrote: |
3 |
> > All, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the |
6 |
> > Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch |
7 |
> > teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is |
8 |
> > available via the layman module "openrc". |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I would also like to give the docs team a chance to weigh in here and |
11 |
> > work with me on a migration guide as well as any necessary updates. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > That being said, I will be the primary point of contact on the |
14 |
> > transition to OpenRC appearing in ~arch (along with it's associated |
15 |
> > baselayout-2.0.0 ebuild). Any and all grievances, concerns, |
16 |
> > suggestions and comments can and should be routed to me via the |
17 |
> > associated Bugzilla entries or e-mail. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I do not want OpenRC to come as a surprise to anyone and break their |
20 |
> > system. I expect we will leave no stone unturned and go for a very |
21 |
> > smooth transition. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > That being said, the bug for the addition of OpenRC is #212696 [1]. |
24 |
> > The bug for the documentation is #213988 [2]. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Lastly, I will be out of town March 21st through March 23rd. I will |
27 |
> > not have IRC access but I will have e-mail and Bugzilla access. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212696 |
30 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213988 |
31 |
> |
32 |
> It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger |
33 |
> <vapier@g.o> and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the |
34 |
> OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and |
35 |
> committed it to the tree this weekend. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Since my offer to work on the migration was not good enough for him, I'm |
38 |
> backing out and allowing him to handle the whole migration himself since |
39 |
> I haven't heard from him at all despite Roy (author of OpenRC) and my |
40 |
> attempts to contact him for 2 weeks regarding a migration plan for |
41 |
> OpenRC. All issues and comments can be directed to him. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> I guess working together and documenting everything before having it hit |
44 |
> the tree was a bad plan and it had to be one-upped. |
45 |
|
46 |
not sure why you're getting pissy. but let's put some things straight shall |
47 |
we. |
48 |
|
49 |
- the ebuild in question was from the layman repo. i changed things of course |
50 |
because it didnt cover all upgrade pieces, had obvious style problems, and |
51 |
did some things wrongly. |
52 |
- i'd been poking openrc on my system long before "this weekend". |
53 |
- only pinging people on irc does not constitute real effort. we have e-mail |
54 |
addresses too last i checked. |
55 |
- the package is still p.masked and de-keyworded. nothing precludes you from |
56 |
working on it. or writing docs. or doing anything else you're talking about |
57 |
doing. |
58 |
- and no, i dont have a problem sticking masked/de-keyworded things in the |
59 |
tree. people test things then. |
60 |
-mike |