| 1 |
Friedrich Oslage wrote: |
| 2 |
> Josh Saddler schrieb: |
| 3 |
>> Mmm, not so much. Documentation like this, that's so specific to one |
| 4 |
>> particular architecture, would be better off in project documentation -- |
| 5 |
>> that's (partly) why ya'll have project directories in the first place. |
| 6 |
>> Otherwise it becomes a maintenance burden for the GDP. It'll be easier |
| 7 |
>> on the Sparc team to maintain it if it's in their own /proj/ space. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> What we can do, however, is list it in metadoc.xml, so that it will show |
| 10 |
>> up in /doc/en/list.xml. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Right, x86 or ppc users won't benefit from reading it ;) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I moved it to the sparc space and attached the revided news item. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Regards, |
| 18 |
> Friedrich |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
s/mutlilib/multilib/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I also don't understand why this news item needed to wait for a Portage |
| 23 |
to go stable. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Petteri |
Archives