Re: [gentoo-dev] Clang toolchain

[Matthias Maier]

> - libcxxabi is probably the new way to go instead of libcxxrt; last
>   time I checked there was a chicken and egg problem: libcxxabi needed
>   clang + libc++ to build, so bootstrapping the stack was a bit
>   painful.

I give libcxxabi a try.

Does anybody has a bit insight in the current status of the llvm's
bundled libunwind in libcxxabi, i.e. is it trivially portable?

If yes, this might clean up the dependency chain quite a bit.

Best,
Matthias