Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 decision delayed
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:41:37
Message-Id: 43EDB07D.7030907@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 decision delayed (was: Gentoo Council Meeting Summary (20060209)) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3 >On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:14:26 -0500 Chris Gianelloni
4 ><wolf31o2@g.o> wrote:
5 >| Interesting, yes... but ebuilds are read by humans and it is necessary
6 >| to be comprehensible a lot more than the Manifest files are.
7 >
8 >Sure. But the comparison would show whether or not it's going to make a
9 >substantial difference. And if it does, there're other things that can
10 >be done in the Manifest file that'll save a whole load of space too
11 >(e.g. using $ to represent $PN, ! to represent files/, * to represent
12 >ChangeLog and so on, since these characters aren't allowed in any
13 >filename in the tree).
14 >
15 >
16 >
17 When you have thousands of small files (1-4 blocks), the space saved by
18 removing all unnecessary whitespaces is minimal at best.
19 Minimizing the number of files is another story. Unifying manifests with
20 digest files will save a considerably amount of disk space.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Manifest2 decision delayed Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 decision delayed John Mylchreest <johnm@g.o>