From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? | ||
Date: | Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:55:36 | ||
Message-Id: | w6ga78wudrv.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? by Michael Orlitzky |
1 | >>>>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Two things on that page are outright wrong: |
4 | |
5 | > 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the |
6 | > new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild, repoman |
7 | > commit --straight-to-stable option should be used. |
8 | |
9 | > That violates our other stabilization policies and common sense. |
10 | |
11 | This is in the context of revision bumps, not version bumps. Also, the |
12 | item immediately preceding it clarifies that any non-trivial changes |
13 | require dropping to ~arch. |
14 | |
15 | Ulrich |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |