Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:55:36
Message-Id: w6ga78wudrv.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? by Michael Orlitzky
1 >>>>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2
3 > Two things on that page are outright wrong:
4
5 > 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the
6 > new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild, repoman
7 > commit --straight-to-stable option should be used.
8
9 > That violates our other stabilization policies and common sense.
10
11 This is in the context of revision bumps, not version bumps. Also, the
12 item immediately preceding it clarifies that any non-trivial changes
13 require dropping to ~arch.
14
15 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks? Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>