Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

[Mike Frysinger]

On 14 Feb 2016 21:31, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 09:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >>>> If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change
> >>>> the virtual back. One-line change.
> >>> Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the
> >>> default to eudev in the first place.
> >> OH, my, this is looking more like you are being paid by systemd peeps...
> > honestly ?  cut the crap man.
> >
> >> You are just refusing to acknowledge these simple facts.
> >>
> >> systemd.................:  irrelevant to this decision
> >>
> >> standalone systemd-udev.:  Vehemently unsupported, support for its
> >>                            capability to exist is planned to be punted
> >>                            in the future.
> >>
> >> eudev...................:  fully functional, actively developed,
> >>                            and fully supported, mature project, been
> >>                            around for years.
> > udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and
> > develops against.
> Not the standalone config we're using, so if you remove all
> systemd-using distros which are irrelevant to this discussion you end up
> with gentoo, and ~15 distros that use eudev. And of course other
> irrelevant weirdos that use mdev, vdev etc.
> >
> > eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it.
> No one runs udev either. So that's a non-argument
>
>
> So given the context of this discussion, and your ignorant contribution
> ... maybe you should cut the crap, man. Being a bit more polite wouldn't
> be wrong either.

yes, your e-mails in this thread are a shining example of how to
collobarate and make cogent arguments.  attacking people directly
is definitely how you "win".  it's too bad i haven't actually done
any of what you're attempting to slander me with here.
-mike