Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:55:19
Message-Id: 484C1CE6.3070406@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees by "Piotr Jaroszyński"
1 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
2
3 > 1. GLEP54
4 > 2. GLEP55
5
6 None of them got discussion back in -dev, the glep hadn't been changed
7 as requested during the unnecessary long discussion in the meeting.
8
9 Looks like the overall consensus is that those aren't useful as they are
10 and thus either you fix them, discussing the changes with the people in
11 -dev (NOT THE COUNCIL) or you may retract them.
12
13 > 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs
14
15 Somebody is thinking the PMS and the EAPI definition as it is are wrong
16 and should be replaced since they aren't useful for their purpose.
17
18 lu
19
20 --
21
22 Luca Barbato
23 Gentoo Council Member
24 Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
25 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>