1 |
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> If there's some value to be found in having PMS ready by a particular |
3 |
> date that I'm missing then I want to hear it so that I can spend more |
4 |
> time working on PMS and less on other things. |
5 |
|
6 |
semantics aside, how much time you dedicate is entirely up to you and really, |
7 |
i dont think there's too many developers who honestly care how that affects |
8 |
you |
9 |
|
10 |
i consider having a spelled out EAPI=0 spec to be quite valuable and worth |
11 |
spending time on and i have to say that i get the feeling that i'm not alone |
12 |
on this point |
13 |
|
14 |
having a behavior explanation cuts back on the "well it works in portage so go |
15 |
screw yourself" mentality and replaces it with "package manger foo does not |
16 |
behave according to spec" which certainly opens up the door for people to use |
17 |
alternative package managers with the Gentoo ebuild tree (hmm we're gonna |
18 |
have to stop referring to it as the "Gentoo portage tree" eh) |
19 |
-mike |