Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 20:30:35
Message-Id: 4FB95428.2040204@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? by Dan Douglas
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/20/2012 07:22 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
5
6 > I'd put money on there not being a single admin who has ever used
7 > the games group to control access to games. Games really have no
8 > business being on a system where anything like that is a
9 > requirement to begin with.
10 We (students council) use pam_ldap for users and primary groups and
11 pam_group w/ /etc/security/group.conf for secondary groups like
12 video,sound,games.
13
14 We actually considered restricting the games group to certain login
15 times (i.e. after 18 pm ) to prevent our fellow students from gaming
16 during office hours, but that just lead to long time sessions
17 over-night. Since group memberships are evaluated on session creation.
18
19 I can imagine some multi-user setups (parents/children) were some user
20 shouldn't play games-fps/* at all.
21 But who actually shares a computer these days.
22
23 One real benefit of extra groups is some chmod g+s hack for e.g. skype
24 in combination with firewall rules restricting outbound connections.
25 http://soup.xmw.de/post/151673185/Restricting-Skype-on-Gentoo
26
27 Have a nice day ...
28
29 - --
30 Gentoo Dev
31 http://xmw.de/
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
34 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
35
36 iF4EAREIAAYFAk+5VCgACgkQknrdDGLu8JB8SwD+JARCPBmK13Sl2/n3dsWWx/8p
37 LBH6j18YbfD1+IWpXaUA/iWCgTS3TI78kSTwe0hnASc+7wTygiWvIcxlPmcv9LtQ
38 =XXxi
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Dan Douglas <ormaaj@×××××.com>