| 1 |
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 09:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller пишет: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If package has ssl support use ssl USE flag for that. In case there |
| 4 |
> > are alternatives, use openssl/gnutls/nss for upstream _less_ |
| 5 |
> > recommended implementation(s). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Small problem: If a user enables more than one of openssl/gnutls/nss |
| 8 |
> then he'll get the less recommended implementation. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
This problem is even worse in case there is no ssl USE flag. There will |
| 11 |
be no way to ask for best ssl implementation and user will have to think |
| 12 |
and select suggested implementation for each package separately. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I'd rather add the USE flag for the upstream recommended |
| 15 |
> implementation too, and enable it with highest priority in case of |
| 16 |
> conflicting flags. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
In case upstream has hard priorities I think ewarn is enough (or just |
| 19 |
drop broken implementations). Adding more conflicting USE flags just |
| 20 |
makes situation worse. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Peter. |
Archives