1 |
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 18:40 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 00:29 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:58:58 -0600 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
4 |
> > wrote: |
5 |
> > | How about both options? Some people prefer getting email reports, |
6 |
> > | others prefer just going to a website. I don't see how this could be a |
7 |
> > | problem, so why not offer both? :) Perhaps we should ask the author to |
8 |
> > | rewrite his proposed GLEP to be more of a QA monitoring system that |
9 |
> > | devs could use. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Mmm, I think it'd help more if the author was actually aware of how |
12 |
> > development works. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> In a perfect world, thats the case. Last time I checked, we don't live |
15 |
> in a perfect world. Are you talking general development practices, or |
16 |
> Gentoo specific practices? If its the latter, do we have a doc that |
17 |
> covers some QA/practices related topics that maybe aren't covered in the |
18 |
> dev handbook? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Its going to be hard to get around this problem with people, so why not |
21 |
> create something that might make them aware of their problems and offer |
22 |
> ways to help them get better instead of complaining about them? |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
Also the other issue is for instance that say some eclass gets |
26 |
depreciated, or some new function is used to add stuff to say /etc/env.d |
27 |
(doenvd, check if ebuild does 'insinto /etc/env.d'), and the dev missed |
28 |
that - this could be nice things to add to this checker, as it will |
29 |
ensure we do not sit with 20 ways of doing the same thing, but not |
30 |
exactly wrong. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Martin Schlemmer |
35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
36 |
Cape Town, South Africa |