1 |
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:39:39 -0500 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > PMS just provides a mechanism, but doesn't prefer one SLOT value |
5 |
> > over another. Such a change would introduce policy into PMS which |
6 |
> > is not the right way to go. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Sure it does - it defaults to :* when :* was never specified. I don't |
9 |
> see how defaulting to :0= is a "policy" any more than :* is. |
10 |
|
11 |
SLOT=0 isn't special in PMS these days. (Historically it was. Now SLOT |
12 |
is mandatory, and it doesn't default to 0.) |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
Ciaran McCreesh |