| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:15:45 +0100 Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | I would like to unify possible devices via the USE_EXPAND'ed |
| 5 |
> | LCD_DEVICES. Right now, this would contain about 50 devices [1]. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> How standardised is the naming of these devices? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It's not. It's the union of the (upstream) driver's names in lcdproc and |
| 10 |
lcd4linux. Those devices that are supported by both programs had the |
| 11 |
lcdproc name staying and the lcd4linux one cut. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It's also hard to standardise the names as some of the drivers are not |
| 14 |
actual devices (as curses or X11) while others stand for a whole family |
| 15 |
of devices or can talk to several different devices depending on the |
| 16 |
user configuration. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Regdards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Robert |
Archives