| 1 |
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 07:17, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Saturday 13 December 2003 02:51 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 13:48, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Based on the comments of the last thread on -dev about this GLEP I |
| 5 |
> > > created a new version. Please take a look at |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0016.html |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > The substance of this isn't changed as far as I can tell: the brunt of |
| 10 |
> > creating all these .desktop files and maybe icons still lies on us. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I still agree with a point made in the last thread: |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > What's so bad about filing this as an upstream request instead? It |
| 15 |
> > significantly reduces our work since we don't have to do it for hundreds |
| 16 |
> > of packages. Instead, an upstream developer only has to do it once. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Most desktop related applications already ship with a .dekstop file and an |
| 19 |
> icon, you just have to install them in the correct locations. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And those that don't? Do we do it ourselves or send upstream? I think |
| 22 |
you need to mention this in the GLEP. |
Archives