| 1 |
On 08/04/2010 08:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> @Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every |
| 7 |
>>> single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are |
| 8 |
>>> active and which are dead |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Pruning projects that don't actively elect a lead would be a good start |
| 12 |
>> and that doesn't require anything from the council to be implemented. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Regards, |
| 15 |
>> Petteri |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> Don't you think we need a team for that? Who is eligible to filter the project |
| 18 |
> list and ask status updates from them? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I think undertakers can take care of any possible cleanup commits as |
| 22 |
they already touch project pages for developer retirements. If you want |
| 23 |
to join for that purpose just be in contact with them and I think they |
| 24 |
will accept my proposal. As for just status queries I think anyone could |
| 25 |
query the status from projects and nothing special is required. Of |
| 26 |
course we should coordinate so that many simultaneous queries are not done. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Petteri |
Archives