1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 05/10/2012 11:39 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
>> Are there any other licenses besides *GPL and FDL that would |
5 |
>> require such a file? |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> What do you think? |
8 |
|
9 |
> The "GPL-2+" file workaround doesn't sound to bad. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Call be picky, but we could actually use a "GPL-3+" file, too. |
12 |
> With that we could distinguish "exactly GPL 3" and "GPL 3 or later" |
13 |
> properly on our end, no matter if GPL 4 ever comes or not. |
14 |
|
15 |
Yes, that was the idea. Otherwise we would have to start over again |
16 |
whenever a GPL-4 appears. |
17 |
|
18 |
AFAICS, we would need 9 additional license files, namely GPL-{1,2,3}+, |
19 |
LGPL-{2,2.1,3}+, and FDL-{1.1,1.2,1.3}+. |
20 |
|
21 |
Ulrich |