| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu May 22 2003 3:02 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> My biggest point against long descriptions is the fact they need to be |
| 7 |
> written. That is not such a big point if the users will do it. I do |
| 8 |
> think though that a description file might be more appropriate than |
| 9 |
> putting the long description in the ebuild. A package description should |
| 10 |
> always be the same I feel, even over versions. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Maybe they don't have to be written. They can be optional. In the |
| 14 |
presence of it, it's displayed, if not, fine. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I don't see that we have to require the field. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cheers, |
| 19 |
Dylan Carlson |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 22 |
Key fingerprint = 3AEA DE38 FE42 15A6 C0E2 730E 3D04 BCC1 708E 165F |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQE+zSDqPQS8wXCOFl8RAmv+AJ9wnfN8vcUfzyEfUx/DelKiLUMxyQCfVCEN |
| 27 |
U+jODCQuYHL4wkshKAaysdE= |
| 28 |
=tacK |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives