Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: multiple inheritance support for profiles
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:22:40
Message-Id: 20060813202244.5b7714cf@sven.genone.homeip.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: multiple inheritance support for profiles by Alec Warner
1 On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:01:41 -0400
2 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Zac Medico wrote:
5 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6 > > Hash: SHA1
7 > >
8 > > Brian Harring wrote:
9 > >
10 > >>Said single inheritance protection was added 06/05/06 (rev 3544),
11 > >>stabled for x86 roughly 06/22/06.
12 > >>
13 > >>Hasn't even yet made it to a release media- meaning folk installing
14 > >>from the most current release media still can get bit in the ass by
15 > >>switching to an N parent from the get go.
16 > >
17 > >
18 > > I'm not sure what the probability of people hurting themselves like
19 > > this is. Perhaps it's a negligible corner case and a note in the
20 > > upgrade guide will be enough to keep the vast majority of users on
21 > > the right track. I'd hope that a user would be wise enough to read
22 > > some docs prior to switching to a new profile with a potentially
23 > > outdated version of portage.
24 > >
25 >
26 > Damn your mail client ;)
27 >
28 > The past[1] has shown that users don't read docs.
29 >
30 > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63400
31
32 And don't forget the "virtuals" bug. Remember the discussion about repo
33 versioning? These are all use cases for it, so if a new profile format
34 is getting introduced we should really implement that versioning
35 support.
36
37 Marius
38
39 --
40 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
41
42 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
43 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature