1 |
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:01:41 -0400 |
2 |
Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
5 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
6 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Brian Harring wrote: |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> >>Said single inheritance protection was added 06/05/06 (rev 3544), |
11 |
> >>stabled for x86 roughly 06/22/06. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >>Hasn't even yet made it to a release media- meaning folk installing |
14 |
> >>from the most current release media still can get bit in the ass by |
15 |
> >>switching to an N parent from the get go. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > I'm not sure what the probability of people hurting themselves like |
19 |
> > this is. Perhaps it's a negligible corner case and a note in the |
20 |
> > upgrade guide will be enough to keep the vast majority of users on |
21 |
> > the right track. I'd hope that a user would be wise enough to read |
22 |
> > some docs prior to switching to a new profile with a potentially |
23 |
> > outdated version of portage. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Damn your mail client ;) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> The past[1] has shown that users don't read docs. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63400 |
31 |
|
32 |
And don't forget the "virtuals" bug. Remember the discussion about repo |
33 |
versioning? These are all use cases for it, so if a new profile format |
34 |
is getting introduced we should really implement that versioning |
35 |
support. |
36 |
|
37 |
Marius |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
41 |
|
42 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
43 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |