1 |
I didn't want to have to respond to this, but... |
2 |
|
3 |
Don't change rm's default behavior. There is nothing wrong with rm. |
4 |
There are many people who have for years (decades?) used rm and expect |
5 |
it to work a certain way, i.e. the Unix way, which is to (wrongly?) |
6 |
assume the user knows what she is doing and to quietly exit |
7 |
successfully. If you must have new behavior, have a new command, say |
8 |
gentoorm. Or if you must mess with rm, make sure by default it uses |
9 |
traditional Unix behavior unless you pass it |
10 |
--some-nonstandard-option-that-otherwise-breaks-rm. But please don't |
11 |
change the way most people expect rm to work. |
12 |
|
13 |
--m |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |