| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:29:03PM -0400, James Cloos wrote: |
| 2 |
> It would be a bit easier to read if there were a third section in |
| 3 |
> the tracker for renames, rather than having them in the Removals |
| 4 |
> and Additions sections. |
| 5 |
The detection tool runs solely based on the CVSROOT 'History' file. |
| 6 |
Based on that alone, we cannot detect a rename reliably. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If something gets renamed or removed in quick sucession, the updates |
| 9 |
tracking files can be out of date as well |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Obviously the syntax of each line would have to be different; perhaps |
| 12 |
> something like the {old⇒new} syntax would allow each change to be on |
| 13 |
> a single line in a (human+machine)-readable fashion? |
| 14 |
Two sets of output are already provide. One for humans, and one for |
| 15 |
machines. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
P.S. I am on the mailing list, you do not need to CC me. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy |
| 22 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 23 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives