| 1 |
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:04, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> I agree; while I'm labeling it ABI, includes both bad soname handling |
| 3 |
> and seperate sonames. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
those people should be smacked (for the interest of disclosure, i have |
| 6 |
violated the "bad soname" rule for the sake of following upstream) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Feel free to point out a 4th option if I'm missing it, but for the |
| 9 |
> request, that's what exists afaict; meanwhile, stating that pkgs are |
| 10 |
> being stupid, while true, doesn't actually solve the issue :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
4) portage maintains a list of ABI SONAMEs in use and does not unmerge the |
| 13 |
library until all consumers are gone |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
i'm referring to the specific file of course, not anything else in the |
| 16 |
package ... so integrating the hack eutils.eclass:preserve_old_lib() into |
| 17 |
portage so it isnt a hack (not a knock against the current implementation |
| 18 |
here; it's always going to be a hack until portage manages proper unmerging |
| 19 |
of the ABI library) |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives