1 |
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> And as long as I keep reading such statements I won't use ld.gold |
4 |
> anywhere on my (dev-)systems. A linker IMHO is a far too crucial |
5 |
> toolchain component to blindly play around with. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
There really isn't any need to use it as a daily driver. |
9 |
|
10 |
If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build |
11 |
with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result |
12 |
in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker as well. |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
Rich |