| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I am used to etcat -v <pkg> to get the available packages. And as etcat is |
| 7 |
deprecated, I had a look at equery list <pkg>. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
And I really wonder, if people prefer an output like this (from current |
| 10 |
equery): |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
$ equery list -i -o -p gentoolkit |
| 13 |
[ Searching for package 'gentoolkit' in all categories among: ] |
| 14 |
* installed packages |
| 15 |
[I--] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre10 (0) |
| 16 |
* Portage tree (/var/portage/tree) |
| 17 |
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre2 (0) |
| 18 |
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre4 (0) |
| 19 |
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre1 (0) |
| 20 |
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre3 (0) |
| 21 |
[-P-] [ ~] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre9 (0) |
| 22 |
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8 (0) |
| 23 |
* overlay tree (/var/portage/overlay) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
or in contrast to something like this (which is based on the etcat output): |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
$ ~/portage/equery.my.old list -i -o -p gentoolkit |
| 28 |
Searching for package 'gentoolkit' in all categories among: |
| 29 |
* installed packages |
| 30 |
* Portage tree (/var/portage/tree) |
| 31 |
* overlay tree (/var/portage/overlay) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
* app-portage/gentoolkit-dev |
| 34 |
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre1 (0) |
| 35 |
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre2 (0) |
| 36 |
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre3 (0) |
| 37 |
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre4 (0) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
* app-portage/gentoolkit |
| 40 |
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8 (0) |
| 41 |
[-P-] [ ~] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre9 (0) |
| 42 |
[I--] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre10 (0) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
I have a patch available for current equery to (additionally) generate the |
| 45 |
second output, though I don't know, why one would ever use the first output |
| 46 |
over the second output. |
| 47 |
I wonder, what people would miss, if current output would totally be exchanged |
| 48 |
with my proposed output (based on etcat stuff). |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
come on and tell me :-) |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
take care, have fun |
| 54 |
/christian |
| 55 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 56 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
iD8DBQFBdsKZmauZIX3ydQURAhjYAKD8KRk09A9z06qxdgcdZgsyiRIQqACfQpPo |
| 59 |
JF78g1HN19y7Pm246WwbQ6E= |
| 60 |
=jQ2i |
| 61 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-- |
| 64 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives