Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Cc: | base-system <base-system@g.o>, Julian Ospald <hasufell@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Allow to configure base patch location for epatch_user | ||
| Date: | Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:07:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_k52kHB6sCYKWHTihghhjQ5L-v_7+cGiUOwt8kMa23heQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Allow to configure base patch location for epatch_user by Julian Ospald |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Julian Ospald <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > This is particularly useful for people who run alternative |
| 3 | > package managers and want to control their configuration. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I certainly support the principle, but for the sake of transparency |
| 6 | can we try to coordinate this so that the setting name doesn't change |
| 7 | when this moves into the package manager for EAPI6? PMS is more about |
| 8 | the content of the ebuilds, so presumably all package managers could |
| 9 | structure how patches are provided by the user in whatefver way is |
| 10 | most consistent with how they already operate. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Allow to configure base patch location for epatch_user | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Allow to configure base patch location for epatch_user | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |