1 |
On 3/2/08, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 3/2/08, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > I know this is going to stir up quite some discussion, but I do think |
5 |
> > it's worth trying requesting it at least. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that |
8 |
> > were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would like that |
9 |
> > this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot partecipate in |
10 |
> > Summer of Code as students for Gentoo. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I'm not asking to penalise Gentoo developers are students. But I |
13 |
> > sincerely think the main goal of Summer of Code is to allow new people |
14 |
> > to enter the scene of Free Software, to understand how Free Software |
15 |
> > projects work and so on. Gentoo Developers are already pretty well |
16 |
> > "inside" this world. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> OK |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > I think it should be a self-made decision to abstain from applying as a |
24 |
> > student for what you already partecipate in, but as such concerns don't |
25 |
> > seem to be widespread (at least as the last two years shown), I'm asking |
26 |
> > for a formal decision to all the developers. If that is requested, I'm |
27 |
> > even willing to bring this in front of the council. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The summer of code faq specifically addresses this question; so |
31 |
> obviously it was a concern and they dealt with it. |
32 |
|
33 |
Brian suggested I add a link, so ;) |
34 |
|
35 |
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_already_opensource |
36 |
|
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > Gentoo's ranks are quite reduced nowadays, and a few persons have shown |
41 |
> > conerns about our current recruiting methods being able to judge clearly |
42 |
> > technical and social skills, as well as the time one is ready to pour |
43 |
> > into the project. I think SoC could be used as a pretty good recruiting |
44 |
> > method: as you are going to work quite a bit with the student, you can |
45 |
> > easily judge availability and technical and social skills. Leaving SoC |
46 |
> > applications open to developers means wasting this opportunity. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> OK |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > There are many other organisations partecipating, I think it would be |
54 |
> > quite feasible for Gentoo developers wanting to be a student SoC to |
55 |
> > choose another one, in which they are not involved already. Yes it's |
56 |
> > easier for them to do something for Gentoo as they are already |
57 |
> > contributing, but that is not the point of Summer of Code, the point is |
58 |
> > to introduce new people into projects, not giving money to people to do |
59 |
> > what they already do. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Your entire argument is based on the assumption that the Summer of |
63 |
> Code program's primary goal is to recruit new developers for Open |
64 |
> Source projects. While this is one goal I am unsure if holding it |
65 |
> above the others is necessary. |
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > And just to take a stance, even if this request is to be rejected, I'm |
70 |
> > not going to mentor a student that is already a Gentoo developer, for |
71 |
> > sure. |
72 |
> |
73 |
> |
74 |
> Your choice, as I badly wrote in the guide[1], mentors must be williing. |
75 |
> |
76 |
> |
77 |
> > |
78 |
> > So to be clear, I'm not trying to look down to anybody, I don't even |
79 |
> > want to stop people from being paid for their work. I just wish that we |
80 |
> > can focus this opportunity to improve the Gentoo project as a whole. |
81 |
> |
82 |
> |
83 |
> I disagree and I will mentor anyone who meets Google's submission |
84 |
> requirements and who writes a good proposal. |
85 |
> |
86 |
> -Alec |
87 |
> |
88 |
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/userrel/soc/mentoring.xml |
89 |
> |
90 |
-- |
91 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |