Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:17:59
Message-Id: CANSUr=KQZUu8TMp3kZ8RFn2aY3xVLQEaef5NUF02u6gH7UdJEg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Peter Stuge
1 On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote:
2
3 > Sergey Popov wrote:
4 > > >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died
5 > > >>
6 > > >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say
7 > > >
8 > > > Define dead?
9 > >
10 > > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private
11 > > e-mails or in maillists.
12 >
13 > Define very long time?
14 >
15 >
16 > //Peter
17 >
18 If you have some reason we should be sticking to vixie-cron, please stop
19 being so mysterious and share it with the rest of us.
20
21 Thanks!
22 -Ben