| 1 |
> Did you autogenerate these ebuilds? It looks like the deps were pulled |
| 2 |
> out of a conditional in the original qt. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
They were pulled out, but they weren't autogenerated. It's all still a work in |
| 5 |
progress. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I've seen this in all of the split qt ebuilds. Should it go in the eclass? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yep, going to work on an eclass today. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Why do you need to do this again? It should've been saved from the last |
| 12 |
> phase. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is a remnant from an earlier version with an earlier portage. It's probably |
| 15 |
safe now not to have. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> The postrm comment doesn't match the action. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Will fix. Many thanks. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives