| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> # Gen 2 Developer <someone@g.o> (`date`) |
| 3 |
> # Masked for testing. |
| 4 |
>>=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Please people, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.If you find |
| 11 |
> that you cannot commit an ebuild because of badly keyworded |
| 12 |
> dependencies, then drop the relevant keywords and file a bug report |
| 13 |
> with a KEYWORDREQ. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So you have made two comments. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
1) 'Package.mask not for testing.' |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
2) 'If you cannot commit an ebuild due to badly keyworded deps; file |
| 20 |
bugs to get them fixed.' |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I agree with 2 but not with 1. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If pmask is not for testing...what is it for? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-Alec |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Kind regards, |
| 31 |
> JeR |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
Archives