| 1 |
On R, 2017-08-04 at 16:43 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:37:15 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +0000, Lucas Ramage wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my |
| 6 |
> > > personal |
| 7 |
> > > overlay. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Ok, how about I mark myself as maintainer then and add you as co |
| 10 |
> > -maintainer for OpenRC aspects, and you can e-mail me fixes for |
| 11 |
> > openrc |
| 12 |
> > or otherwise? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Last time I checked, plymouth-0.9.x had a hard requirement for |
| 15 |
> systemd |
| 16 |
> to work. From what I remember, making 0.9.x versions work with openrc |
| 17 |
> might become a hard to solve task. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If Lucas concludes that, I guess he could maintain a restored 0.8.x, |
| 21 |
while there's 0.9.x systemd version maintained by me and hopefully |
| 22 |
others (help still welcome, I'm still waiting on bug 613222, but might |
| 23 |
be able to convert another machine earlier to plymouth). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Personally I've always connected plymouth with systemd and I'm |
| 26 |
surprised some open OpenRC bugs were triggering treecleaning, but yes, |
| 27 |
having a maintainer is always good as there are some service bug open |
| 28 |
too, but so it is for the countless other maintainer-needed packages we |
| 29 |
have around. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Mart |
Archives