| 1 |
On 14 August 2013 16:59, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/14/2013 11:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:50:36 +0800 |
| 4 |
>> Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On 08/14/2013 11:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:03 +0800 |
| 7 |
>>>> Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>>> On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400 |
| 10 |
>>>>>> Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 11 |
>>>>>>> I am all for the standarts, but as we did not brought sets to PMS |
| 12 |
>>>>>>> yet(when we updated it for EAPI changes), my question is: 'why?'. |
| 13 |
>>>>>>> It is one of the long-standing feature of quite experimental |
| 14 |
>>>>>>> 2.2_alpha branch, that should finally come to release(Thanks to |
| 15 |
>>>>>>> portage team, by the way :-)). |
| 16 |
>>>>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>>>> Why it was not added as a part of the PMS? Some implementation |
| 18 |
>>>>>>> flaws? Or maybe, architecture problems? |
| 19 |
>>>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>>>> Because the Portage format involves executing arbitrary Python |
| 21 |
>>>>>> code that can depend in arbitrary ways upon undocumented Portage |
| 22 |
>>>>>> internals that can change between versions. |
| 23 |
>>>>>> |
| 24 |
>>>>> You keep repeating that. |
| 25 |
>>>>> |
| 26 |
>>>>> That doesn't make it more true. |
| 27 |
>>>> |
| 28 |
>>>> It's not a question of "more true", it simply is true. Look at the |
| 29 |
>>>> class line. |
| 30 |
>>> |
| 31 |
>>> Looking at, for example, kde overlay: |
| 32 |
>>> https://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=tree;f=sets;h=0e7389b34215915696d99fdb19e03c6d5ce1902f;hb=HEAD |
| 33 |
>>> |
| 34 |
>>> All the sets I've had a look at are a list of package atoms. |
| 35 |
>>> |
| 36 |
>>> No python code involved. None of your conspiracy theories supported. |
| 37 |
>>> (Maybe it'd be easier to discuss this if there were a design document |
| 38 |
>>> for it, but ain't no one got time for dat) |
| 39 |
>>> |
| 40 |
>>> So ... what was your claim again? |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>> Uhm. Look at the class line. |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
>> https://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=blob;f=sets.conf;h=1f4c4263f48e5360606c1acc97fbab64b03541b7;hb=HEAD |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> ... a static identifier. |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> I would usually call that a constant. Now I get bored with your |
| 50 |
> trolling. Goodbye. |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Lets stop this offtopic discussion pretty please. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
Regards, |
| 57 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 58 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives