| 1 |
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples Ви написали: |
| 3 |
> > And here it is |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> - if [[ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]]; then |
| 6 |
> + if [ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]; then |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> You know, it is funny to see these lines after all those cries about how [ |
| 9 |
> is evil and we should really never ever use it but rather always use [[ |
| 10 |
> form :). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Oh, btw, does the compliant sh correctly process the most cited |
| 13 |
> composition? : [ -n $foo ] && [ -z $foo ] && echo "huh?" |
| 14 |
> (straight from devmanual, the primary reason why [ is considered bad) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[...] will crap a brick if foo expands to multiple arguments which is why |
| 17 |
[[...]] is preferred ... it'll do the sane thing and work correctly |
| 18 |
regardless |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives