1 |
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:21:20PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/18/2012 11:22 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:05:05PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
4 |
> >> On 11/18/2012 09:58 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > <an on-topic discussion about copyright thread response from me snipped> |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> We develop open source software in public repositories. A developer |
9 |
> >> decided it would be helpful to change the software name systemd to |
10 |
> >> eudev, among other things, in various files after misunderstanding what |
11 |
> >> the Foundation officers in charge of legal matters had approved. You |
12 |
> >> objected to it. I asked for clarification after seeing that your name |
13 |
> >> had not been removed from any copyright notices. You explained your |
14 |
> >> complaint. I asked you to wait for the person who wrote the commit to |
15 |
> >> fix it. It was fixed. |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> >> That is all that was necessary. Whining on the list did not wake the |
18 |
> >> author of that commit sooner. Furthermore, the changes that you wanted |
19 |
> >> would have been made in a few days had you not become involved. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > None of the words you wrote here seem to me to be related to my response |
22 |
> > about copyright, the Gentoo Foundation, and how copyright works for |
23 |
> > software projects at all. So I'm a bit confused, what are you concerned |
24 |
> > about here? |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > greg k-h |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Your issue has been resolved. You can stop beating the dead horse now. |
29 |
|
30 |
I was responding to a discussion about how copyright works, and how it |
31 |
should be marked as such for Gentoo-related projects, that was not |
32 |
correct in my knowledge of copyright law. It had nothing to do with "my |
33 |
issue", or the udev issue at all, which is why I even changed the |
34 |
subject. |
35 |
|
36 |
Oh well. |
37 |
|
38 |
*plonk* |