Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:13:49
Message-Id: 20080714031344.3c629b2c@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:06 +0100
2 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > People are already doing those other things, and doing them badly,
5 > because there's currently no other option. This isn't some
6 > hypothetical future requirement.
7
8 When you wrote "doing them badly", did you mean to imply doing
9 something else than GLEP 55, or were you just slagging off whoever
10 implemented eblits in sys-libs/glibc?
11
12 In other words perhaps, is it your opinion that GLEP 55 needs to be
13 implemented because sys-libs/glibc requires an immediate rewrite? Are
14 there any bug reports that would be good examples of why this new
15 implementation is warranted?
16
17
18 JeR
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>