1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> There's no reason that a dozen of packages PDEPENDs on |
4 |
> bash-completion. If one decides not to use bash-completion any |
5 |
> longer, I don't see a reason to rebuild all those packages just to |
6 |
> get rid of one PDEPEND (and a single file). |
7 |
|
8 |
The question is where to draw the line: |
9 |
|
10 |
"There's no reason that a dozen of packages RDEPENDs on emacs. If one |
11 |
decides not to use emacs any longer, I don't see a reason to rebuild |
12 |
all those packages just to get rid of one RDEPEND (and a single |
13 |
file)." |
14 |
|
15 |
Same argument. ;) Should packages install their emacs support files |
16 |
(it's only one or two small files in most cases) unconditionally? |
17 |
|
18 |
But seriously: I believe that most people would agree that logrotate |
19 |
config files should be installed unconditionally, whereas in the case |
20 |
of emacs they would disagree. bash-completion is somewhere inbetween. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ulrich |