Archives
Archives
| From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@×××××.uk> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:38:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040107163601.GA16315@cerberus.oppresses.us | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? by Chris Bainbridge |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:13:51PM +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 2 | > Daniel Robbins said in August: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | |
| 5 | In another post in that thread, he said that he had consulted with his |
| 6 | lawyer and dual copyrights were, indeed, a bad idea. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Jon Portnoy |
| 10 | avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? | Alexander Futasz <acid.punk@×××.net> |