| 1 |
On Saturday 31 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 23:41 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > In which case your Paludis fork of Gentoo will take off like a |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Please, pretty please with sugar atop: Stop this FUD about forking |
| 6 |
> > Gentoo. Paludis is not a fork of Gentoo, it's new package manager. The |
| 7 |
> > relation between Portage and Paludis can, if at all, probably be |
| 8 |
> > compared to dselect vs apt. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Actually, I think we're reading him differently, Danny. I read |
| 11 |
> Christopher's email as saying "base a fork of Gentoo, using Paludis as |
| 12 |
> its package manager, and run with it." To me, he did not imply that |
| 13 |
> paludis is a fork of gentoo at all. |
| 14 |
Correct, because the only way Ciaran can prove beyond doubt that his Paludis |
| 15 |
is a viable option is to see hundreds, nay millions, of people using it. I'm |
| 16 |
quite sure that he won't achieve that goal by bleating in here as frequently |
| 17 |
as he is currently. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
CS |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives